Date: Fri, 29 Jan 2010 16:44:25 +0100 From: Giovanni Trematerra <giovanni.trematerra@gmail.com> To: Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> Cc: Attilio Rao <attilio@freebsd.org>, FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: A strange thing with yesterday's head.. Message-ID: <4e6cba831001290744m6067691ct489c61fe9cd28502@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <117532D7-75B9-4BE8-A8B6-0A6761064B92@lakerest.net> References: <B4F940BE-04BD-4ACC-B686-21D61423D236@lakerest.net> <20100128201520.6a114290@ernst.jennejohn.org> <117532D7-75B9-4BE8-A8B6-0A6761064B92@lakerest.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 10:55 PM, Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> wrote: > I was running SCHED_ULE on an 8.0 and everything works > fine. > > On my 2 core head of yesterday I tried both SCHED_ULE AND > 4BSD.. and got the same results ;-0 > > I will try my 4 core when I get home ;-) > > R > On Jan 28, 2010, at 11:15 AM, Gary Jennejohn wrote: > >> On Thu, 28 Jan 2010 10:30:37 -0800 >> Randall Stewart <rrs@lakerest.net> wrote: >> >>> All: >>> >>> I just found a very strange thing with yesterdays head. >>> >>> The program >>> >>> http://www.freebsd.org/~rrs/my_thr.c >>> >>> I compile it: >>> >>> cc -g -o my_thr my_thr.c /usr/lib/libthr.a -lpthread >>> Hi Randal, I tried your code on an 8-core machine with a fresh head (i386) I have no problems with both 4BSD and ULE scheduler. I even upping the value of macro NUM_THREAD to 24 but I didn't notice nothing strange. Have you got a chance to reproduce it on your machines? -- Gianni
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4e6cba831001290744m6067691ct489c61fe9cd28502>