Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2005 13:10:22 -0700 From: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> To: Frank McConnell <fmc@reanimators.org> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, Chris Gabe <chris@borderware.com>, dpk <dpk@dpk.net>, Ted Wisniewski <ted@ness.plymouth.edu> Subject: Re: RELENG_5 PAE panic Message-ID: <42F7BC2E.9000501@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <200508062051.j76KphGm063013@lots.reanimators.org> References: <200507290034.j6T0YLdZ014411@lots.reanimators.org> <20050729091624.R74149@fledge.watson.org> <200507291809.j6TI9p37035628@lots.reanimators.org> <200508021726.j72HQPQG051111@lots.reanimators.org> <200508022220.j72MKvUt056654@lots.reanimators.org> <200508050514.j755EWpH019403@lots.reanimators.org> <20050806105211.I15658@shared10.hosting.flyingcroc.net> <200508062051.j76KphGm063013@lots.reanimators.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Frank McConnell wrote:
> I have two ways to provoke the failure: starting named (a modified
> BIND 8
As a general rule, it would be a good idea to start thinking about moving
toward BIND 9. The 9.4 series will have better performance, DNSSEC, and
other attractive features. If you start thinking about it now, you will
hopefully be prepared down the road.
hth,
Doug
--
This .signature sanitized for your protection
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42F7BC2E.9000501>
