Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 00:19:21 +0100 From: "=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?=" <ermal.luci@gmail.com> To: "Alessandro Silveira" <alessandro.dev@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Optimize HFSC Message-ID: <9a542da30812031519x56f690d2vbd0fc16b84db235c@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <720e1f20812031133g11b1ec2ah2f7b3fdc7245dd54@mail.gmail.com> References: <720e1f20812031133g11b1ec2ah2f7b3fdc7245dd54@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 3, 2008 at 8:33 PM, Alessandro Silveira
<alessandro.dev@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a Storage with high input traffic in a network, in add
> 192.168.16.8, and a playout in add 192.168.16.50.
>
> I am using Packet Filter for to ensure low delay in streams of video
> with samba, using real time, but i get poor results,
> someone know a best AltQ/PF configuration for streams.
>
> My Altq configuration:
>
> queue root_em0 bandwidth 1Gb priority 1 qlimit 100 {SYSTEM_QUEUE}
> queue SYSTEM_QUEUE bandwidth 1Gb qlimit 100 {AVNQOS1, SYSYTEM_DEFAULT}
> queue AVNQOS1 bandwidth 100Mb priority 7 qlimit 10000 hfsc( ecn
> realtime 100Mb upperlimit 100Mb )
>
> But in Realtime m1 is 100Mb, m2 is 50MB and d is 18.
>
> My Rule configuration:
>
> pass out on em0 inet proto tcp from 192.168.16.8 to 192.168.16.50 tos
> 0x10 queue AVNQOS1
>
> Thanks.
>
I understand it this way
http://forum.pfsense.org/index.php/topic,11986.0.html
Just consider that that post considers an patched pfctl to allow m1
smaller than m2.
Reports say that it actually improves performance and it was the way
initial HFSC implementation worked.
> P.S. Sorry for my bad english.
> _______________________________________________
> freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"
>
--
Ermal
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?9a542da30812031519x56f690d2vbd0fc16b84db235c>