Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 3 Dec 2005 20:18:02 -0800
From:      Royce <mroyce@gmail.com>
To:        Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-geom@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: gmirror forget question - why forget gm0 instead of ad4?
Message-ID:  <2b0d6fa20512032018g581dc6feybcf13c05e85af3ec@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20051204004358.GD3698@garage.freebsd.pl>
References:  <6.2.5.6.2.20051203155803.05950eb0@baac.net> <20051204004358.GD3698@garage.freebsd.pl>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Pawel, thanks! This is just the info I needed. Now it makes sense, rather
than risking running commands I don't understand.

Royce

On 12/3/05, Pawel Jakub Dawidek <pjd@freebsd.org> wrote:
>
>
> If a drive fails or is not detected, gmirror doesn't know if it was ad4,
> da0, da0s1a or anything else, because it discovers components based on
> their metadata, not names. By doing 'gmirror forget' you say: "forget
> about missing components". Without forgetting missing components you
> can't run specific actions, which need to be notes in metadata of all
> components.
>
>



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2b0d6fa20512032018g581dc6feybcf13c05e85af3ec>