Date: Tue, 30 Apr 2013 11:51:39 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Dag-Erling_Sm=C3=B8rgrav?= <des@des.no> To: Winston <wbe@psr.com> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [FreeBSD-Announce] FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-13:05.nfsserver Message-ID: <86a9oggxck.fsf@nine.des.no> In-Reply-To: <201304292226.r3TMQOnI056590@psr.com> (Winston's message of "Mon, 29 Apr 2013 18:26 EDT") References: <20130429205552$12b7@rincewind.paeps.cx> <201304292226.r3TMQOnI056590@psr.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Winston <wbe@psr.com> writes:
> For the purpose of the NFS vulnerability in 9.0-RELEASE, does it make
> any difference whether one has used /etc/exports and an explicitly
> started nfsd, or exported the files using "zfs set sharenfs={options}"
> if the exported file system in both cases is ZFS? (That's probably
> similar to asking whether ZFS has its own NFSd code or uses
> /usr/sbin/nfsd.)
ZFS does not have its own NFSD. What happens when you set sharenfs on a
dataset is that it updates /etc/zfs/exports and HUPs mountd.
DES
--
Dag-Erling Smørgrav - des@des.no
home |
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?86a9oggxck.fsf>