Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 27 Sep 2011 16:03:11 +0100
From:      Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
To:        "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, h h <aakuusta@gmail.com>, ade@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org,  Kevin Oberman <kob6558@gmail.com>
Subject:   Re: HEADS UP: ports/ and 10.0-CURRENT
Message-ID:  <CADLo83-XW2=cp2RZo18%2B-tAxSMFwKAQ7eGVkdvrxDOPN4yKroQ@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <20110927091830.GA35900@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>
References:  <20110926230335.041fd9aa@lab.lovett.com> <CAN6yY1t5wJ3%2B4LG=upL6sR7tSNU6Uhx-y=L0AJm6rKFsKnvPiQ@mail.gmail.com> <86mxdqfq69.fsf@gmail.com> <4E818941.7060006@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <20110927091830.GA35900@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 27 September 2011 10:18, Anton Shterenlikht <mexas@bristol.ac.uk> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 27, 2011 at 10:28:49AM +0200, O. Hartmann wrote:
>> On 09/27/11 08:35, h h wrote:
>> >Kevin Oberman<kob6558@gmail.com> =A0writes:
>> >
>> >>On Mon, Sep 26, 2011 at 9:03 PM, Ade Lovett<ade@freebsd.org> =A0wrote:
>> >>
>> >>>With the advent of the conversion of HEAD to 10.0-CURRENT and, as to =
be
>> >>>expected, ports/ is going to be essentially unusable for a while.
>> >>>
>> >>>The issue stems from configure scripts (to choose something completel=
y
>> >>>at random) assuming that FreeBSD would never jump to a double-digit
>> >>>major version number, and as such, various regexps for "freebsd1*" (i=
e:
>> >>>FreeBSD 1.1.x) are now matching "freebsd10".
>> >[...]
>> >>
>> >>aDe,
>> >>
>> >>Could an entry to this effect be added to UPDATING (with a matching
>> >>entry when ports/ is "unbroken").
>> >
>> >Also mention a workaround, e.g.
>> >
>> > =A0 $ export UNAME_r=3D'9.9-BLAH'
>>
>>
>> Now I understand why some OS vendors have choosen the latin 10 'X' for
>> their tenth version of their operating system ...
>
> At least there will be a long rest after
> the move to 10 is complete.. until FreeBSD 100.
>


I'm afraid not;

freebsd2*)

We'll be just as screwed at 20.

Hopefully we can fix that at the same time.

Chris



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CADLo83-XW2=cp2RZo18%2B-tAxSMFwKAQ7eGVkdvrxDOPN4yKroQ>