Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 17 Aug 2007 14:58:36 +0200
From:      "Karsten W. Schmidt / DLX ApS" <ks@dlx.dk>
To:        <current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: Promise SATA 300 TX4 cause
Message-ID:  <C07650ED07FD0F458F7E409B22E15DB53AE2@exch.hoffice.dk>
In-Reply-To: <86odh6ikcf.fsf@ds4.des.no>
References:  <46C4FD44.1060105@fusiongol.com> <86odh6ikcf.fsf@ds4.des.no>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

>> After some poking around, I can confirm Karsten's report that it is
>> indeed the following edit that causes problems with the Promise card:
>>
>> http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-src/2007-June/079930.html
>
> Once again, *no*.  This commit may have exacerbated the problem, but
> people were having trouble with Promise controllers already in April.

Maybe it’s the same problem, but before this change I never had any data corruption.
The only problems I have with a kernel older than this change is these.

ad20: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
ad20: WARNING - SETFEATURES SET TRANSFER MODE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
ad20: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE RCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
ad20: WARNING - SETFEATURES ENABLE WCACHE taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
ad20: WARNING - SET_MULTI taskqueue timeout - completing request directly
ad20: TIMEOUT - READ_DMA retrying (1 retry left) LBA=276459

-- 
Karsten


Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?C07650ED07FD0F458F7E409B22E15DB53AE2>