Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 10:15:09 +0000 (UTC) From: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bz@FreeBSD.org> To: Vladimir Kondratyev <vladimir@kondratyev.su> Cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-all@FreeBSD.org, dev-commits-src-main@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: git: a1181662d370 - main - LinuxKPI: Add devm_device_add_group to linux/device.h Message-ID: <n66n70o1-4039-s518-94s7-0opr7rq4oq12@SerrOFQ.bet> In-Reply-To: <75796855-cf79-4538-81c5-ae6f7765d2d3@kondratyev.su> References: <202407211314.46LDEoW4023107@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <0964qqop-qrsn-2rpq-1n4s-snr76ps12no9@SerrOFQ.bet> <75796855-cf79-4538-81c5-ae6f7765d2d3@kondratyev.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 24 Jul 2024, Vladimir Kondratyev wrote: Hi, I think what we really need it to write it down once and for all and the 4-5 people working on it agree to it and put it into the tree as a document so it is clear. Hence a small malinging list and other bits to coordinate would be helpful. I know I documented the last state I had been told at the top of linux_80211.c but I do see that for other (public) bits I was asked to use lkpi_ as well in the past and not just linuxkpi_ and both of us had started using linux_* still for our early commits (which I never liked as it collides with linuxolator). >> Can this be fixed before MFC? >> > > Yes if you insist on that. No, I don't anymore I think. But I would really hope we could cleanup all of them and document the one way then. I had once proposed a README for sys/compat/linuxkpi but it found little response back then. I'll dig it up and restart the thread with the current set of people. /bz -- Bjoern A. Zeeb r15:7
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?n66n70o1-4039-s518-94s7-0opr7rq4oq12>