Date: Sun, 16 Dec 2012 20:17:55 -0600 From: Tim Daneliuk <tundra@tundraware.com> To: Chris H <chris#@1command.com>, freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: How do I circumvent the use of clang during build? Message-ID: <h4lclup7dernwysnbcefi0hn.1355710675507@email.android.com>
index | next in thread | raw e-mail
As I understand it, gcc is still the default on 9 ----- Tim Daneliuk Chris H <chris#@1command.com> wrote: >Greetings, > I recently made a <failed> attempt to move from RELENG_8 >to RELENG_9. I've been on BSD since the early 80's, and with >the exception of a couple of failed kernels (my fault), I've >never had one failure with the build(world|kernel) || >install(world|kernel). The only notable difference I noticed, >was the addition of clang. While I can't (yet) conclusively >blame it on clang. I _can_ say, that the whole process took _3_ >times longer, than without. So my question is; is it possible >to build(world|kernel) && install(world|kernel) without the >clang toolchain? If for no other reason but to discover whether >clang was responsible for the failure, and whether building w/o >clang is any faster. > >Thank you for all your time, and consideration. > >--Chris > >_______________________________________________ >freebsd-stable@freebsd.org mailing list >http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-stable >To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-stable-unsubscribe@freebsd.org"help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?h4lclup7dernwysnbcefi0hn.1355710675507>