Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 18 Aug 2005 01:49:16 +0200
From:      Emanuel Strobl <Emanuel.strobl@gmx.net>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Cc:        current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Pending if_fwip.c patch
Message-ID:  <200508180149.26632@harrymail>
In-Reply-To: <20050817185447.GC16558@odin.ac.hmc.edu>
References:  <20050817141436.GB1143@unixpages.org> <20050817185447.GC16558@odin.ac.hmc.edu>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

[-- Attachment #1 --]
Am Mittwoch, 17. August 2005 20:54 CEST schrieb Brooks Davis:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 04:14:36PM +0200, Christian Brueffer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > can someone commit the attached patch for if_fwip.c?  It fixes a panic
> > on attach and has been reviewed by dfr@.
>
> Done.  Apparently there's aren't a lot of fwip users of current since I
> broke that over a month ago. :(

I had done some fwip tests before it was broken, I need ggate over iee1394 
for gmirror service. But my (simple) tests showed advantages for fwe 
regarding performance.
If you're looking for testers, I'd give it another try, I prefer active 
maintained parts over microbenchmark winning ones...

Thanks,

-Harry


>
> -- Brooks

[-- Attachment #2 --]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBDA80GBylq0S4AzzwRAt5rAJ9V/UkgFOknKCHsMSoUWIbUDuOa2gCgjdAV
RJ59m6HJg7ZDOD1hwzBw+iQ=
=Zaz1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200508180149.26632>