Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 17:38:12 +0200 From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" <phk@phk.freebsd.dk> To: Jim Thompson <jim@netgate.com> Cc: small@freebsd.org, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD's embedded agenda Message-ID: <3500.1148571492@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Thu, 25 May 2006 05:27:30 -1000." <472414CE-94E8-4C8A-9586-DCA9E02A53C3@netgate.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <472414CE-94E8-4C8A-9586-DCA9E02A53C3@netgate.com>, Jim Thompson wri tes: >> NanoBSD caters only to the "run read-only from flash" area, call >> it if you will the "soekris" area. I need to investigate if it >> makes sense to use the FreeSBIE framework to build nanobsd images. > >All soekris boards have CF, which looks, for all the world like an >IDE drive. > >"real" flash is quite different. NanoBSD works fine with "raw" flash as well because it is practically read-only. Writing a flash-friendly-filesystem would be a good project. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3500.1148571492>