Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 09 Nov 2010 14:17:11 +0100
From:      "Svein Skogen (Listmail account)" <svein-listmail@stillbilde.net>
To:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Per core frequency control
Message-ID:  <4CD949D7.6030003@stillbilde.net>
In-Reply-To: <201011091256.51140.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>
References:  <201011091256.51140.naylor.b.david@gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig5CFB1A3B10D5E31420103943
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On 09.11.2010 11:56, David Naylor wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I was reading through cpufreq(4) and in the bugs section it mentions th=
at per=20
> core (or CPU) frequency control is not supported.  That all cores/CPUs =
have to=20
> be at the same speed. =20
>=20
> What is the reason for that? =20
>=20
> Is it an infrastructure problem with FreeBSD or has it just not been=20
> implemented? =20
>=20
> And how will the recent work on event timers (and a "tickless" kernel) =
impact=20
> on this problem?=20

You did read the "symmetric" part of "symmetric multi processor" didn't y=
ou?

It's a limitation of the technology. One clock.

//Svein

--=20
--------+-------------------+-------------------------------
  /"\   |Svein Skogen       | svein@d80.iso100.no
  \ /   |Solberg =D8stli 9    | PGP Key:  0xE5E76831
   X    |2020 Skedsmokorset | svein@jernhuset.no
  / \   |Norway             | PGP Key:  0xCE96CE13
        |                   | svein@stillbilde.net
 ascii  |                   | PGP Key:  0x58CD33B6
 ribbon |System Admin       | svein-listmail@stillbilde.net
Campaign|stillbilde.net     | PGP Key:  0x22D494A4
        +-------------------+-------------------------------
        |msn messenger:     | Mobile Phone: +47 907 03 575
        |svein@jernhuset.no | RIPE handle:    SS16503-RIPE
--------+-------------------+-------------------------------
A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text.
Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing?
A: Top-posting.
Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail?
------------------------------------------------------------
                     Picture Gallery:
          https://gallery.stillbilde.net/v/svein/
------------------------------------------------------------


--------------enig5CFB1A3B10D5E31420103943
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkzZSdsACgkQODUnwSLUlKQygQCfYysmjfV25f+xQ0hxUssaeUS2
jsMAnitqb75CHoo+b2XYDBS3XVx5354c
=Tv7A
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig5CFB1A3B10D5E31420103943--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4CD949D7.6030003>