Date: Thu, 3 Jul 2014 04:47:24 -0600 (MDT) From: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> To: Mattia Rossi <mattia.rossi.mailinglists@gmail.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: /tmp, /var/log, /var/tmp as /dev/md - why? Message-ID: <alpine.BSF.2.11.1407030436060.99346@wonkity.com> In-Reply-To: <53B3EB29.4030908@gmail.com> References: <201407010925.s619PHeT006679@mech-cluster241.men.bris.ac.uk> <44a6e8a451a.810fa8f@mail.schwarzes.net> <53B3EB29.4030908@gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 2 Jul 2014, Mattia Rossi wrote:
>
> Am 01.07.2014 21:27, schrieb Andreas Schwarz:
>> Speed and speed, but I can't understand why using md here, there is already
>> tmpfs,
>> which optimzed for such cases (dynamic allocation, etc.).
>>
>> root@pizelot:~ # df
>> Filesystem 1K-blocks Used Avail Capacity Mounted on
>> /dev/mmcsd0s2a 983680 57252 847736 6% /
>> devfs 1 1 0 100% /dev
>> /dev/mmcsd0s2d 8106716 3068708 4389472 41% /usr
>> /dev/mmcsd0s2e 8106716 155976 7302204 2% /var
>> /dev/mmcsd0s2f 8106716236 7457944 <sip:2367457944> 0% /home
>> tmpfs 1097160 4 1097156 0% /tmp
>> tmpfs 1097160 4 1097156 0% /var/tmp
>>
>
> On an embedded systems with little memory I prefer to limit the partitions to
> a certain size, like 32M, so dynamic allocation is no advantage. What other
> differences are there between tmpfs and a simple md device?
> I'd be interested in knowing any tricks, that can make the system faster :-)
The white paper on tmpfs (wiki.deimos.fr/images/1/1e/Solaris_tmpfs.pdf)
says:
"RAM disks use memory inefficiently; file data exists twice in both
RAM disk memory and kernel memory, and RAM disk memory that is not
being used by the file system is wasted. RAM disk memory is
maintained separately from kernel memory, so that multiple
memory-to-memory copies are needed to update file system data."
So a limited-size tmpfs will be faster and use less memory overall. A
benchmark comparison would be interesting.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.11.1407030436060.99346>