Date: Mon, 25 Oct 2004 20:01:51 +0200 From: Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl> To: "Matthias F. Brandstetter" <haimat@lame.at> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Samba+ACLs, CURRENT or STABLE? Message-ID: <20041025180151.GB1107@alex.lan> In-Reply-To: <200410251449.30755.haimat@lame.at> References: <200410251449.30755.haimat@lame.at>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Oct 25, 2004 at 02:49:30PM +0200, Matthias F. Brandstetter wrote: > Hi all, > > I plan to setup a Samba fileserver with ACLs as a Windows domain > controller. First I tried with Linux, but I am afraid ACLs are not > wonderfully supported by it (you have to patch some core tools etc.). > > So I thougt I try it with FreeBSD. 5.x seems good for this task, since it > supports ACLs "out of the box". Now my problem is, that I want to use this > server in a production environment, but on freebsd.org I see CURRENT > should not be used for such machines. > > So my question, what to do now? Are ACLs for Samba supported on STABLE as > well, or is it safe to use CURRENT? > > Greetings and TIA, Matthias I don't think 4 STABLE has ACL. I would suggest installing 5.3 RC1. This is already prity stable and will be officaly afther a few week/months. Do be conservitive with upgrading until the 5.3 release is out. You can also install 5.2.1 plus patches instead if you like an actual release better. This prity stable althou officaly not a stable but i feel that you can safly use it. -- Alex Please copy the original recipients, otherwise I may not read your reply. WWW: http://www.kruijff.org/alex/FreeBSD/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041025180151.GB1107>