Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 8 Mar 2002 18:00:02 -0800 (PST)
From:      Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org>
To:        freebsd-doc@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: docs/35644: lo(4) page presumes familiarity with printf. 
Message-ID:  <200203090200.g29202d47534@freefall.freebsd.org>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
The following reply was made to PR docs/35644; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Dima Dorfman <dima@trit.org>
To: swear@blarg.net
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: docs/35644: lo(4) page presumes familiarity with printf. 
Date: Sat, 09 Mar 2002 01:57:07 +0000

 "Gary W. Swearingen" <swear@blarg.net> wrote:
 > 
 > >Number:         35644
 > >Category:       docs
 > >Synopsis:       lo(4) page presumes familiarity with printf.
 > >Description:
 > The lo(4) man page presumes familiarity with "printf" when it uses "%d"
 > in two places.  Bad presumption.
 
 At least the first usage ("lo%d") is idiomatic; almost all manual
 pages (esp. those for drivers) in section 4 use it.  Grep'ing for "%d"
 through sections 1, 4, 6, and 8 returns over 500 matches; some of
 these are no doubt not what we're looking for, but many are.  I think
 it's reasonable to assume that the reader can mentally replace "%d"
 with "an integer".  I wouldn't object to this being documented in some
 of the intro(X) manual pages, but I don't think it's wise to change
 all the pages that use this notation.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200203090200.g29202d47534>