Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 30 Aug 1995 21:11:56 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      hm@altona.hamburg.com (Hellmuth Michaelis)
To:        tony@thing.sunquest.com (Tony Jones)
Cc:        hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: GNUmalloc for XFree86
Message-ID:  <m0snsYG-00000wC@ernie.altona.hamburg.com>
In-Reply-To: <9508301727.AA13282@thing.sunquest.com> from "Tony Jones" at Aug 30, 95 10:27:22 am

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>From the keyboard of Tony Jones:

> I've seen several discussions on this list regarding the large memory 
> requirements of XFree86 when using the system malloc, and that GNUmalloc
> might be a solution.
> 
> I'm assuming people have tried using GNUmalloc - does anyone have any stats
> on how much of a benefit it provides ?

I have recompiled XFree86 3.1.1 using gnumalloc and i'm very satisfied with
it. I have had a machine with 16M of ram and after starting my usual X
environment (fvwm with lots of goodstuff modules) it eat up half of my 48M
swapspace, since i recompiled with gnumalloc, this went down to 2..4% and
it "felt" much more "flexible". Anyway, i just bought an additional 8M
recently ...

> If it's tangible, I might go fetch the X sources and rebuld (any pitfalls
> to watch for here?)

No pitfalls, at least not for me, just configure to use -lgnumalloc, recompile
and reinstall (i also configured gcc to use -pipe).

hellmuth
-- 
Hellmuth Michaelis           hm@altona.hamburg.com              Hamburg, Europe
                                              (A)bort, (R)etry, (I)nstall BSD ?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?m0snsYG-00000wC>