Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2007 12:27:13 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Cc: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr>, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net>, current@freebsd.org, S?ren Schmidt <sos@deepcore.dk>, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> Subject: Re: recent commits break via 8235 ata Message-ID: <200703271227.14308.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20070327140741.GA60454@kobe.laptop> References: <4608A5D9.2010902@root.org> <20070327151058.5qk9etifk880g4cc@webmail.leidinger.net> <20070327140741.GA60454@kobe.laptop>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tuesday 27 March 2007 10:07:42 am Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > On 2007-03-27 15:10, Alexander Leidinger <Alexander@leidinger.net> wrote: > > Quoting Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> (from Tue, 27 Mar > > 2007 11:28:24 +0300): > > > > >On 2007-03-26 22:04, Nate Lawson <nate@root.org> wrote: > > >>Something between 2007/2/19 and 2007/3/25 breaks ata on my VIA laptop. > > >>It boots and ad0 is not detected so it can't mount root. > > >> > > >>The device is: > > >>atapci0: <VIA 8235 UDMA133 controller> port > > >>0x1f0-0x1f7,0x3f6,0x170-0x177,0x376,0xfc00-0xfc0f at device 17.1 on pci0 > > >> > > >>PCI config: > > >>atapci0@pci0:17:1: class=0x01018a card=0x120a14ff chip=0x05711106 > > >>rev=0x06 hdr=0x00 > > > > > >There are other devices which also have detection problems. snd_ich and > > >snd_hda are two that I know. > > > > > >Can you try updating to a kernel before the latest ACPI import? We seem > > >to be having various interesting problems with the kernel during the last > > >10 days or so, and that's one of the major changes that went in... > > > > Another reason may be the change in nexus from jhb. > > Yes. I haven't had the time to do binseach through the changes, to see > which was the "one commit" which broke snd_hda here. If that is the case it's because code was using rman_get_bus(handle|tag) on a resource that wasn't activated yet which wouldn't have worked before the nexus changes either. Well, the bus tag might have been right, but the handle for SYS_RES_MEMORY would have been wrong. -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200703271227.14308.jhb>