Date: Tue, 24 Sep 2002 10:45:00 -0400 (EDT) From: John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> To: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Mike Barcroft <mike@FreeBSD.org>, Mikhail Teterin <mi+mx@aldan.algebra.com>, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/contrib/gcc toplev.c Message-ID: <XFMail.20020924104500.jhb@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20020923233405.GB79965@dragon.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23-Sep-2002 David O'Brien wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 23, 2002 at 03:43:44PM -0400, John Baldwin wrote:
>> Is it due to stuff in __asm restraints that diff's like these would fix:
>>
>> --- i386/i386/math_emulate.c 20 Jun 2002 07:23:08 -0000 1.41
>> +++ i386/i386/math_emulate.c 17 Jul 2002 02:53:57 -0000
>> @@ -760,8 +760,7 @@
>> if ((ti.sign = (ti.b < 0)) != 0)
>> __asm__("notl %0 ; notl %1\n\t"
>> "addl $1,%0 ; adcl $0,%1"
>> - :"=r" (ti.a),"=r" (ti.b)
>> - :"0" (ti.a),"1" (ti.b));
>> + :"+r" (ti.a),"+r" (ti.b));
>> int_to_real(&ti,tmp);
>> }
>>
>> (etc.. I have a bunch of these)
>
> We're you going to do a clean up pass a few months ago? (or was it
> someone else) Did you get very far?
I committed most of it. I think bde had some objections to the
few patches I still have outstanding. I also have several patches
to try and cleanup the alpha inline asm that I still need to test. :-/
--
John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> <>< http://www.FreeBSD.org/~jhb/
"Power Users Use the Power to Serve!" - http://www.FreeBSD.org/
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?XFMail.20020924104500.jhb>