Date: Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:34:06 -0800 From: David Greenman <dg@root.com> To: Joseph Koshy <jkoshy@FreeBSD.ORG> Cc: cvs-committers@hub.freebsd.org, cvs-all@hub.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/conf options param.c src/sys/kern init_sysent.c syscalls.c syscalls.master uipc_syscalls.c src/sys/sys mbuf.h socket.h socketvar.h syscall-hide.h syscall.h syscall.mk sysproto.h src/sys/vm vm_object.c Message-ID: <199811060834.AAA13130@implode.root.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Nov 1998 00:23:20 PST." <199811060823.AAA03217@hub.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Slight change of topic: > >Has anyone looked at Chuck Cranor's UVM (currently in NetBSD?). I think I >remember some of the NetBSD folks touting UVM as a more general solution to >the multiple-copy problem in the kernel. > >I did browse Chuck's Phd thesis but folding in UVM to FreeBSD >is currently beyond my skill level in the kernel. I haven't, but FreeBSD has the necessary infrastructure to do zero-copy type things, so I don't really see how UVM is relevant. (various politically sensitive arguments about why FreeBSD's VM system is superior to everything else elided) -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199811060834.AAA13130>