Date: Tue, 2 May 2000 10:05:54 -0700 (PDT) From: Archie Cobbs <archie@whistle.com> To: rwatson@freebsd.org (Robert Watson) Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ether matching in ipfw?? Message-ID: <200005021705.KAA02870@bubba.whistle.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.NEB.3.96L.1000501221417.18064G-100000@fledge.watson.org> from Robert Watson at "May 1, 2000 10:18:35 pm"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Robert Watson writes: > One advantage to a BPF-like approach would be that you could imagine a > BPF->native code compiler, instead of a BPF execution vm in kernel, giving > performance close to ipfw, if not better, when optimized. These custom > filtering modules built from userland rulesets could also be inserted > into the graph as needed. See also.. http://www.pdos.lcs.mit.edu/~engler/dpf.html -Archie ___________________________________________________________________________ Archie Cobbs * Whistle Communications, Inc. * http://www.whistle.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200005021705.KAA02870>