Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 11:52:51 +0200 From: Andrew Stevenson <andrew@ugh.net.au> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: Willem@offermans.rompen.nl, "freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org" <freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: bf_next not NULL! Message-ID: <A0ED3F72-21EF-4B97-BF4B-AA0AEA336958@ugh.net.au> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomwtRwk8aNcCn3pKzbLspPHN0UKPC4J%2BdS0ebOvHom73g@mail.gmail.com> References: <2DEF8DBE-1444-435C-B48C-FEAB71CA60E5@ugh.net.au> <20160716105843.GA5832@vpn.offrom.nl> <CAJ-VmomwtRwk8aNcCn3pKzbLspPHN0UKPC4J%2BdS0ebOvHom73g@mail.gmail.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 16 Jul 2016, at 17:51, Adrian Chadd wrote: > hi! > > both of these should be fixed in stable/11 :) After many days of building I am now on 11.0-BETA1 r302942. Ping times certainly seem to be better though not 100% stable (but maybe there is interference about). 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=188 ttl=64 time=1.336 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=189 ttl=64 time=1.736 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=190 ttl=64 time=1.859 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=191 ttl=64 time=1.183 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=192 ttl=64 time=9.892 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=193 ttl=64 time=2.228 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=194 ttl=64 time=1.116 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=195 ttl=64 time=1.105 ms 64 bytes from 10.0.0.1: icmp_seq=196 ttl=64 time=1.796 ms I still get the odd: ath0: stuck beacon; resetting (bmiss count 4) but so far much less than before. Thanks for all your effort! Andrewhelp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A0ED3F72-21EF-4B97-BF4B-AA0AEA336958>