Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2003 10:33:44 -0700 From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@freebsd.org> To: Stefan Bethke <stb@lassitu.de> Cc: Andre Guibert de Bruet <andy@siliconlandmark.com> Subject: Re: CPUTYPE considered harmful? (was: Lot's of SIGILL, SIGSEGV) Message-ID: <20030819173344.GB76279@dragon.nuxi.com> In-Reply-To: <844382971.1061287624@[10.0.1.3]> References: <2147483647.1061141322@[172.22.33.128]> <20030817224741.T320@alpha.siliconlandmark.com> <20030818030054.GA58513@dragon.nuxi.com> <20030818211512.GB47959@garage.freebsd.pl> <844382971.1061287624@[10.0.1.3]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Aug 19, 2003 at 10:07:04AM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > >I think he is right, because when upgrading host where was gcc3.2 to > >current -CURRENT (with gcc3.3) 'make world' builds make(1) in first > >place and it is builded by gcc3.2 with CPUTYPE=p4, so it will be broken. > > > >So gcc have to be upgraded in first place (with CPUTYPE=p3). > > Hhm, sounds reasonable. > > However, I had the exact same problem updating from a 5.1-RC to a recent > current on a P III 900, and there, I had CPUTYPE=p3 in make.conf. You must have a early 5.1-RC. Later ones and the release treated CPUTYPE=p4 as an alias for CPUTYPE=p3.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030819173344.GB76279>