Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Apr 2014 09:41:45 +0100
From:      David Chisnall <theraven@FreeBSD.org>
To:        Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD)
Message-ID:  <81BF8B42-A98C-4A0E-BCBB-CA3A795AA980@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9Qhte7G4UZORiem9Mut9g8kDPGAuUd2ou6ZQgreqkfiy6Lw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20140424223540.627bf130.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <535984EC.7050509@mu.org> <CAHSQbTDoDco9bX%2Bgg9EE6x1Mo3pmyBsC8hbwUfFaYfyS4Qqvug@mail.gmail.com> <20140425033141.GB28939@lonesome.com> <CA%2BD9Qhte7G4UZORiem9Mut9g8kDPGAuUd2ou6ZQgreqkfiy6Lw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 25 Apr 2014, at 09:16, Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com> =
wrote:

> Isn't the latest news that Google&co and the linux foundation setup a
> construction that these vital opensource projects get the proper
> funding. Meaning more man power and hopefully less bugs

Yes, there's effort to improve OpenSSL from there, there's the LibreSSL =
project from OpenBSD and there's a from-scratch reimplementation of SSL =
in the Cambridge Computer Lab that's intended for easy verification[1], =
and Apple's CommonCrypto (which, in light of goto fail, might not be the =
best choice), so there are going to be a lot of choices in time for 11. =20=


There are very few users of OpenSSL in the base system (7, I think), so =
rewriting them to use less error-prone APIs would be feasible - a 100% =
OpenSSL-compatible API is not necessarily a requirement for a =
base-system SSL library. =20

so@ and secteam@ get to make the final call on what we should be =
shipping, because they're the ones that will have to suffer from the =
fallout the next time there's a vulnerability.

David

[1] It's written in OCaml, but can have C APIs and can probably be =
compiled into C.  C that is machine generated from a typesafe language =
is a lot less likely to contain memory management bugs than C that is =
generated by a human...=



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?81BF8B42-A98C-4A0E-BCBB-CA3A795AA980>