Date: Sun, 26 Jun 2011 19:32:13 -0400 From: Patrick Lahni <list@cykotix.com> To: freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org Subject: Re: iwn and hostap Message-ID: <BANLkTik6yVJ-2ibHfBJZhwcE4nAqn=1EHA@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <BANLkTinKEpAgi7KEnucWxyCwrfTUsOa91g@mail.gmail.com> References: <BANLkTi=OW7qny9JPOiGDh5-x=Od-nT62TA@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinaJPenCqmK6GMN3GdFWK%2Bw3pwf2Q@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=nZfuQpsxA0Si-Z=QZs6YcVTJ56g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikWPF12nS4upjiJTc5AmrAiUEwNQQ@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTimog=LznNuEVFZ7h8QQc=cVU%2Bb4ow@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTi=n90udjFvyhCZhUcEVXCt5zQwd4g@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTikR7agyOicwi%2B7vxGQB3zr06u5spg@mail.gmail.com> <BANLkTinKEpAgi7KEnucWxyCwrfTUsOa91g@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 7:27 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com>wrote: > I won't be MFC'ing any ath(4) work to -8. > > That way -8 acts as a regression test against the stuff that's in -HEAD. > > since -9 is coming out soon, I don't feel like trying to manage -HEAD, > -9 -and -8 ath(4) code. :) > > > > adrian > > On 27 June 2011 07:25, cykotix <cyko@cykotix.com> wrote: > > > > > > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 6:54 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> > > wrote: > >> > >> Just make sure you run -HEAD. > >> > >> > >> Adrian > >> > >> On 27 June 2011 06:22, cykotix <cyko@cykotix.com> wrote: > >> > > >> > > >> > On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 4:37 PM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com > > > >> > wrote: > >> >> > >> >> On 26 June 2011 23:26, Patrick Lahni <list@cykotix.com> wrote: > >> >> > Adhoc is supported. According to iwn(4): > >> >> > > >> >> > iwn supports station, adhoc, and monitor mode operation. > >> >> > > >> >> > I wasn't sure if that means, just for now? Or is hostap not > planned > >> >> > for > >> >> > these cards supported by iwn? > >> >> > >> >> The card runs closed-source firmware which we can't get to the > insides > >> >> of. I don't know the exact details, but there may be some features > >> >> which we can't really get to in order to support proper hostap modes. > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> adrian > >> > > >> > > >> > Makes sense. Hopefully I'll have better luck with a AR9280 instead. > >> > Thanks > >> > for the input. > >> > > >> > Patrick > > > > I realize this is off topic now, but can I run -HEAD until this is MFC'd > and > > move back to -STABLE at that point? Or is that not really recommended. > > > > Patrick > > > > > Makes sense. I guess I can run -HEAD until -9RELEASE then. Thanks again for all your help. Patrick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BANLkTik6yVJ-2ibHfBJZhwcE4nAqn=1EHA>