Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Apr 2014 10:43:32 +0200
From:      Daniel Nebdal <dnebdal@gmail.com>
To:        Matthias Gamsjager <mgamsjager@gmail.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD)
Message-ID:  <CA%2Bt49P%2Br78YU86uKs-8xYfyvPG%2BDHP8JE7XYxgP-n=dCM7dtaA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CA%2BD9Qhte7G4UZORiem9Mut9g8kDPGAuUd2ou6ZQgreqkfiy6Lw@mail.gmail.com>
References:  <20140424223540.627bf130.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <535984EC.7050509@mu.org> <CAHSQbTDoDco9bX%2Bgg9EE6x1Mo3pmyBsC8hbwUfFaYfyS4Qqvug@mail.gmail.com> <20140425033141.GB28939@lonesome.com> <CA%2BD9Qhte7G4UZORiem9Mut9g8kDPGAuUd2ou6ZQgreqkfiy6Lw@mail.gmail.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On Fri, Apr 25, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Matthias Gamsjager
<mgamsjager@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't the latest news that Google&co and the linux foundation setup a
> construction that these vital opensource projects get the proper
> funding. Meaning more man power and hopefully less bugs.

It remains to be seen which of LibreSSL vs a freshly funded OpenSSL
ends up being the better alternative.

If it comes to that, porting LibreSSL to FreeBSD ought to be quick
work; it should be reasonably stand-alone code, and they're working to
remove as many as possible of the weird/old/incompatible bits. It's
not like our and their libc are massively different either, so ...
cautiously optimistic that it'll be a one-day job to get it compiling
on FreeBSD by the time they feel "done". :)

-- 
Daniel Nebdal



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?CA%2Bt49P%2Br78YU86uKs-8xYfyvPG%2BDHP8JE7XYxgP-n=dCM7dtaA>