Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 19:03:32 +0100 (BST) From: Geoff Buckingham <geoffb@castle.netlink.co.uk> To: jdp@polstra.com (John Polstra) Cc: emulation@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BSDi (binaries give bus error again/still) Message-ID: <199908191803.TAA24150@castle.netlink.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <199908191719.KAA18736@vashon.polstra.com> from John Polstra at "Aug 19, 99 10:19:14 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> In article <199908191707.SAA22123@castle.netlink.co.uk>, > Geoff Buckingham <geoffb@castle.netlink.co.uk> wrote: > > > > I am assured it does work in 2.2.8 anyone know what has happend ? > > It must be a very old binary -- i.e., built under an old version of > BSD/OS. Such binaries didn't allow for system-specific address > space differences. They had a certain address hard-coded into them. > > Binaries built under BSD/OS 3.0 definitely work on my 3.2 system. > It has been suggested I back out of the kernel address space changes to get this to work. Is http://www.freebsd.org/FAQ/FAQ262.html#265 correct or has the 1GB come back into STABLE now ? (Basically what sized address space is correct for such binaries?) -- GeoffB To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-emulation" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199908191803.TAA24150>