Date: Sun, 23 Nov 1997 20:03:36 -0700 From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> Cc: Eivind Eklund <perhaps@yes.no>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Version Resolution? Message-ID: <199711240303.UAA21771@mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <l03110700b09e72675ae9@[208.2.87.4]> References: <199711202218.PAA11561@mt.sri.com> <199711202300.JAA00612@word.smith.net.au> <199711202321.QAA11798@mt.sri.com> <199711232328.AAA17394@bitbox.follo.net> <l03110700b09e72675ae9@[208.2.87.4]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> >serious. (I don't like the solution, but I don't see it as a fatal > >flaw - we can, if necessary, nuke the file w/history with regular > >intervals). > > That is, in effect, what I do. The only problem is that Nate INSISTS > that we must AUTOMATICALLY recognize new branches. He is somehow > afraid that someone might mess up the RCS template if they were to > do it manually. No, the RCS file *will* be corrupted when a branch is built until the RCS 'template' builder is updated, which will totally hose CVS up when the underlying RCS file changes *totally* out from under it. I've explained how it happens both publically and privately, so you're just acting like a baby by bringing it up over and over again. Please act like an adult and not like a spoiled child. Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199711240303.UAA21771>