Date: Wed, 28 Apr 2004 20:32:30 +0300 From: Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org> To: Colin Percival <colin.percival@wadham.ox.ac.uk> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: Removing NOCRYPT Message-ID: <20040428173230.GA45284@ip.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <6.1.0.6.1.20040428181623.03cd6ae8@popserver.sfu.ca> References: <6.1.0.6.1.20040427094029.03d3d218@popserver.sfu.ca> <20040427152141.GE65943@ip.net.ua> <408EE0BA.3040907@FreeBSD.org> <200404281014.49691.wes@softweyr.com> <6.1.0.6.1.20040428181623.03cd6ae8@popserver.sfu.ca>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 28, 2004 at 06:18:59PM +0100, Colin Percival wrote: > At 18:14 28/04/2004, Wes Peters wrote: > >Many embedded CPUs are not well suited to software cryto. Colin seems t= o=20 > >have forgotten just how many people ship (sometimes very small) subsets = of=20 > >FreeBSD and need a way to squeeze unused code out of libc et al. >=20 > Ok, I had forgotten that. Can I assume that anyone who needs to save > space like that is going to be building everything themself? > I don't really mind leaving NOCRYPT in the source tree as long as we > get it out of the releases. >=20 Taking NOCRYPT out from releases sounds like a good idea, at least to me! Anyone who needs a crypto-free release can build it easily himself, just passing NOCRYPTO to WORLD_FLAGS should work. Cheers, --=20 Ruslan Ermilov ru@FreeBSD.org FreeBSD committer --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFAj+quUkv4P6juNwoRAtbvAKCKUnOBAnfxmxjTSpQVvhullEvbxgCfdxi6 g1LA680/iwCQHGyhSxvSdRA= =8EfL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --mYCpIKhGyMATD0i+--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040428173230.GA45284>