Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 02:07:41 -0500 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CTM and the Attic Message-ID: <l03102801aff0d17b8bf5@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <19970715012130.45333@keltia.freenix.fr> References: <AFF005F2-8F60D@204.69.236.50>; from Richard Wackerbarth on Mon, Jul 14, 1997 at 04:35:59PM -0500 <AFF005F2-8F60D@204.69.236.50>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
>According to Richard Wackerbarth: >> The tree as distributed by CTM is just the same as you get by running CVSup >> on the CVS tree and, for 2.1, 2.2, and current, doing a CVS checkout >> against the appropriate tag. Files which are deleted get a one line entry >> in the CTM delta to tell ctm to delete the target file. > >The main problem with CTM is when large number of files are deleted. The >deleted files end up in the Attic but get transmitted. Problem is that the >delta generation has no concept of "a file being moved"... The last time that I looked, CVSup still had the same problem. Perhaps the "problem" is that such movement should not occur in the first place. Don't blame the messengers.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03102801aff0d17b8bf5>