Date: Tue, 15 Jul 1997 02:07:41 -0500 From: Richard Wackerbarth <rkw@dataplex.net> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CTM and the Attic Message-ID: <l03102801aff0d17b8bf5@[208.2.87.4]> In-Reply-To: <19970715012130.45333@keltia.freenix.fr> References: <AFF005F2-8F60D@204.69.236.50>; from Richard Wackerbarth on Mon, Jul 14, 1997 at 04:35:59PM -0500 <AFF005F2-8F60D@204.69.236.50>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>According to Richard Wackerbarth: >> The tree as distributed by CTM is just the same as you get by running CVSup >> on the CVS tree and, for 2.1, 2.2, and current, doing a CVS checkout >> against the appropriate tag. Files which are deleted get a one line entry >> in the CTM delta to tell ctm to delete the target file. > >The main problem with CTM is when large number of files are deleted. The >deleted files end up in the Attic but get transmitted. Problem is that the >delta generation has no concept of "a file being moved"... The last time that I looked, CVSup still had the same problem. Perhaps the "problem" is that such movement should not occur in the first place. Don't blame the messengers.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?l03102801aff0d17b8bf5>