Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2026 14:26:24 +0000 From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org To: python@FreeBSD.org Subject: [Bug 294641] science/py-scipy: clean up Message-ID: <bug-294641-21822-yCTrfjWxL6@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/> In-Reply-To: <bug-294641-21822@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=294641 Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vishwin@freebsd.org Attachment #269925| |maintainer-approval- Flags| | --- Comment #2 from Charlie Li <vishwin@freebsd.org> --- Comment on attachment 269925 --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=269925 patch Apart from removing the SF MASTER_SITES, I don't see how this is a clean up. While upstream has not provided a docs tarball for 1.17.1, the docs tarball sync still isn't correct. While sibling project numpy has started to trend towards only providing docs for major versions only, and the logic may appear to extend to scipy, both are still merely speculation. Therefore trying to put a variable for the docs tarball in this case is incorrect. Agree with vvd@ wrt makesum. I personally don't enable DOCS on this port when building it normally (ie not poudriere-testport) so updating the checksum on the docs tarball can get easily missed this way. I understand the want to reduce distfiles fetching when options are disabled but all the distfiles need to be listed in distinfo at all times. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-294641-21822-yCTrfjWxL6>