Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 25 Apr 2014 11:23:42 -0400
From:      Allan Jude <freebsd@allanjude.com>
To:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: OpenSSL vs. LibreSSL (OpenBSD)
Message-ID:  <535A7DFE.1070908@allanjude.com>
In-Reply-To: <535A77D3.2020605@madpilot.net>
References:  <20140424223540.627bf130.ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <535984EC.7050509@mu.org> <535A77D3.2020605@madpilot.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2014-04-25 10:57, Guido Falsi wrote:
> On 04/24/14 23:41, Alfred Perlstein wrote:
>> On 4/24/14, 1:35 PM, O. Hartmann wrote:
>>> It seems that OpenBSD is now forking their own SSL implementation,
>>> called LibreSSL. As
>>> OpenBSD speaks for many similar opinion regarding the state of the
>>> code of OpenSSL, I'd
>>> like to hear what the plans are in FreeBSD for this critical portion
>>> of software.
>>>
>>> Is FreeBSD going to support the effords taken by OpenBSD and
>>> participating in the
>>> LibreSSL development (http://www.libressl.org/)?
>>>
>>> oh
>> We need to discuss the use of comic sans font across our web properties
>> first.
> And, by the way, did they really use a blink tag in their project home
> page???? :D
>

They did really use a <blink> tag, then realized that in modern browsers
like firefox and chrome, it doesn't do anything. So at some point later,
they added some CSS to change the <blink> tag into a CSS animation that
actually blinks.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?535A7DFE.1070908>