Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 21 Sep 2022 14:25:11 -0700
From:      Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>
To:        Larry Rosenman <ler@lerctr.org>
Cc:        Mike Karels <mike@karels.net>, Cy Schubert <Cy.Schubert@cschubert.com>, Brooks Davis <brooks@freebsd.org>, src-committers@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-all@freebsd.org, dev-commits-src-main@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: git: 24e1824e4646 - main - Deprecate telnet daemon
Message-ID:  <YyuBN/jjDBDSkxSf@FreeBSD.org>
In-Reply-To: <5c162710def7eb94c032dfab73e9560e@lerctr.org>
References:  <202209211517.28LFHkoJ089471@gitrepo.freebsd.org> <20220921163951.17C77AC@slippy.cwsent.com> <8EC34FC3-F299-4B03-AD4E-83D062D0E9F6@karels.net> <Yyt%2BEOM/Bnth88Xv@FreeBSD.org> <5c162710def7eb94c032dfab73e9560e@lerctr.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 04:21:15PM -0500, Larry Rosenman wrote:
L> On 09/21/2022 4:11 pm, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
L> > Mike,
L> > 
L> > On Wed, Sep 21, 2022 at 01:02:17PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote:
L> > M> I have no problem with deprecating (or removing) telnetd in base.  I
L> > M> think the client should remain, though.  I use it frequently, 
L> > although
L> > M> not on the telnet port.  ftp* are another issue; anonymous FTP is a
L> > M> perfectly reasonable usage.  I use it to download FreeBSD images 
L> > often.
L> > 
L> > Is there any service where telnet to a port would be preferred over 
L> > nc(1)?
L> 
L> telnet <host> <port> is basically finger memory (at least for me), and 
L> nc isn't
L> in base (AFAIR)

nc(1) is in base since early 2005. Since then I have fixed my finger memory :)

-- 
Gleb Smirnoff



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?YyuBN/jjDBDSkxSf>