Date: Sun, 28 Nov 2004 03:31:35 +0200 From: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@ceid.upatras.gr> To: Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Is this a hole in my firewall? Message-ID: <20041128013135.GD662@gothmog.gr> In-Reply-To: <20041127215612.GA86416@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On 2004-11-27 21:56, Jonathon McKitrick <jcm@FreeBSD-uk.eu.org> wrote: > root@neptune:~# ipfw show > 00100 0 0 check-state > 00200 2 144 allow ip from me to any keep-state out xmit tun0 > 00300 0 0 allow ip from any to any keep-state out xmit tun0 > 00400 0 0 deny tcp from any to any in recv tun0 established > 00500 0 0 allow ip from any to any via vr0 > 00600 0 0 allow ip from any to any via lo0 > 00700 0 0 deny ip from any to 127.0.0.0/8 > 00800 0 0 deny ip from 127.0.0.0/8 to any > 00900 0 0 allow tcp from any to me 22 keep-state in recv vr0 setup > 01000 0 0 allow icmp from any to any via tun0 icmptype 0,3,8,11,12 > 01100 0 0 deny log logamount 100 ip from any to any > 65535 0 0 deny ip from any to any > > I added rule 300 so that my laptop on my wireless network can connect, > ping, and get DNS and DHCP. Is there a better way to specify this? AFAIK, rule 00300 will never be hit by packets going out tun0 as long as you also have rule 00200 in there.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20041128013135.GD662>