Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 18:50:23 +0200 From: Christoph Brinkhaus <c.brinkhaus@t-online.de> To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Cc: Philipp Erbelding <philipp@copythat.de> Subject: Re: ezjail allow.raw_socket handbook wrong confing Message-ID: <20160425165023.GA1540@esprimo.local> In-Reply-To: <D46F506F-DCCE-44C9-A0E4-CEB097930EBC@copythat.de> References: <mailman.87.1461585601.64317.freebsd-doc@freebsd.org> <D46F506F-DCCE-44C9-A0E4-CEB097930EBC@copythat.de>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 05:37:28PM +0200, Philipp Erbelding wrote: Hello Philipp! > Hi, > I think there is a misunderstanding about the issue here. > > > "jailname" in both the paragraph and the configuration line are shown in > > italic because they are strings that the user is supposed to replace > > with the actual jail name. > > > > Would it help to break up that paragraph into shorter sentences? > > > > When raw network sockets are actually needed in a jail, they can be > > enabled. Edit the ezjail configuration file for the individual > > jail, /usr/local/etc/ezjail/jailname. Modify the parameters entry: > > Is the problem with the mentioned section not with the "=1" which is no longer current? > I found this reference in the forums about it only working without the "=1": https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/54365/ > > Kind regards > Philipp export jail_testjail1_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1" is not mentioned in https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/54365/ But I can confirm that the syntax as export jail_testjail1_parameters="allow.raw_sockets=1" works for me. The last line says: "Edit: My mistake in using the first option, the poster has a jail named shell, but I confused it with the shell of the jail." But it is not clear if that helped to fix the issue or not. Kind regards, Christophhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160425165023.GA1540>