Date: Thu, 5 Oct 2006 16:01:20 -0400 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Peter Holm <peter@holm.cc> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org, Ivan Voras <ivoras@fer.hr>, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: Thread stuck in aioprn Message-ID: <20061005200120.GA80070@xor.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <20061005195835.GA19157@peter.osted.lan> References: <20061004203715.GA38692@xor.obsecurity.org> <200610050819.53832.davidxu@freebsd.org> <20061005002203.GB42061@xor.obsecurity.org> <eg2i81$ejp$1@sea.gmane.org> <20061005175606.GA77443@xor.obsecurity.org> <20061005195835.GA19157@peter.osted.lan>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
[-- Attachment #1 --] On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 09:58:35PM +0200, Peter Holm wrote: > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 01:56:06PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 05, 2006 at 11:11:06AM +0200, Ivan Voras wrote: > > > Kris Kennaway wrote: > > > > > > >I guess I was unclear: the stress2 test calls random syscalls with > > > >random arguments, so the error condition is probably from insufficient > > > >sanity checking of the input in aio_read(). > > > > > > Just a thought - does that include using random values of 0,1,2 for file > > > descriptor? > > > > I'd presume it could happen. > > > > Lots of syscalls will hang in this test, but the stress test > environment will send a SIGHUP and a SIGKILL when the default RUNTIME > has expired. That's the theory, anaway. Yep, this one is unkillable, which is the problem (it's run as non-root, too). Kris [-- Attachment #2 --] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFJWSQWry0BWjoQKURAn3HAJ0RIK/EyVa8t59MTaWk4dkbb96yAACeNfYL /ErKg7WD8UPLGvMizOwccE0= =/gKD -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20061005200120.GA80070>