Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Fri, 11 Jul 1997 09:10:49 -0400 (EDT)
From:      "Ron G. Minnich" <rminnich@Sarnoff.COM>
To:        "Daniel M. Eischen" <deischen@iworks.InterWorks.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hardware@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   I2O only available under NDA?
Message-ID:  <Pine.SUN.3.91.970711090947.5368C-100000@terra>
In-Reply-To: <33C4E3CC.41C67EA6@iworks.InterWorks.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I think a reasonable response to this NDA nonsense, if true, is to have 
as many people as possible indicate to the I2O sig that their position IS
nonsense. Just remind them of what happened to MCA when IBM tried the 
same deal. That's what I'm doing.

thanks
ron

Ron Minnich                |Java: an operating-system-independent, 
rminnich@sarnoff.com       |architecture-independent programming language
(609)-734-3120             |for Windows/95 and Windows/NT on the Pentium
ftp://ftp.sarnoff.com/pub/mnfs/www/docs/cluster.html 





Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.SUN.3.91.970711090947.5368C-100000>