Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 23 Jun 2011 12:06:38 -0700 (PDT)
From:      Matthew Jacob <mj@feral.com>
To:        "Alexander V. Chernikov" <melifaro@ipfw.ru>
Cc:        freebsd-current@freebsd.org, mj@feral.com
Subject:   Re: Thoughts on TMPFS no longer being considered "highly experimental"
Message-ID:  <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106231206250.22466@ns1.feral.com>
In-Reply-To: <4E038357.6030505@ipfw.ru>
References:  <20110623163109.GA508@dragon.NUXI.org> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1106231007140.21759@ns1.feral.com> <4E038357.6030505@ipfw.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>>>
>>> I may have missed something, but I'm not aware of any serious PRs on
>>> TMPFS either.
>
> There was some issues with sendfile(2) and mmap(2) causing kernel hangs
> in some cases. vim triggers such hangs for me. However, those problems
> were fixed and MFCed (afair).

Can you sway when?



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?alpine.BSF.2.00.1106231206250.22466>