Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2003 17:43:11 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@locore.ca>, Scott Long <scott_long@btc.adaptec.com>, Julian Elischer <julian@FreeBSD.org>, src-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-src@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/alpha/alpha exception.s genassym.c Message-ID: <20030218014311.GA80429@rot13.obsecurity.org> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302171706430.16142-100000@InterJet.elischer.org> References: <20030217152317.D81102@locore.ca> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0302171706430.16142-100000@InterJet.elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline On Mon, Feb 17, 2003 at 05:20:57PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: > As a sidebar, in my opinion sparc is irrelevant except as a porting > exercize to keep the code clean. I think it is damaging to the project > to have it a tier 1 architecture. In case no-one has noticed the sparc > comes with a unix OS already, so the market is miniscule. techncally > nice, but basically irrelevant to the success of the project except as a > roadblock to progress. Anyhow that's just my opinion. Others are free to > disagree (and obviously do). (Nothing personal, just my opinion on > where we should be placing sparc stuff in he overall priority list.) IA64 also comes with a unix OS (Linux). So does alpha and i386. Why don't we all pack up and go home? Kris --5vNYLRcllDrimb99 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+UY+vWry0BWjoQKURAuk1AJ9rj6guIklQeqN9+N4PtaUTSm7P9wCfbDmo 73WAqib+OEn8d9KB4pOyCTM= =8HIA -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5vNYLRcllDrimb99-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20030218014311.GA80429>