Date: Wed, 16 Oct 1996 13:43:44 -0600 (MDT) From: Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com> To: Tony Kimball <alk@think.com> Cc: nate@mt.sri.com, CPELTIER@iectech.com, freebsd-isp@freebsd.org Subject: Re: pppd reliability Message-ID: <199610161943.NAA13166@rocky.mt.sri.com> In-Reply-To: <199610161942.OAA04433@compound.Think.COM> References: <96Oct16.082411edt.6151@netgate.iectech.com> <199610161649.KAA11620@rocky.mt.sri.com> <199610161942.OAA04433@compound.Think.COM>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Tony Kimball writes: > Quoth Nate Williams on Wed, 16 October: > > : I've got a 486/66 box that was previously running 3 lines at 115K > : full-blast w/out a hiccup. It's down to two b/c we upgraded our link to > : a 56K frame relay line. > > You "upgraded" from 115k >-to-> 56k? A 28.8K modem running at 115K async. RS-232 vs. a 56K sync. Frame relay is a big step up. :) Nate
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199610161943.NAA13166>