Date: Tue, 22 Sep 2015 13:09:53 -0700 From: Sean Bruno <sbruno@freebsd.org> To: "O. Hartmann" <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de>, Eric Joyner <ricera10@gmail.com> Cc: "Pieper, Jeffrey E" <jeffrey.e.pieper@intel.com>, Hans Petter Selasky <hps@selasky.org>, freebsd-current <freebsd-current@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: CURRENT: net/igb broken Message-ID: <5601B591.6000005@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20150922082323.6f861448@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> References: <20150915125618.0f752596@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <55F7FCB5.5090809@selasky.org> <2A35EA60C3C77D438915767F458D65688077F87B@ORSMSX111.amr.corp.intel.com> <20150917133509.6c87f5b6@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <20150917133712.0ffd01ee@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <55FC40CB.7090504@freebsd.org> <CA%2Bb0zg_GzedJ%2BSv4p_R%2Bra6KqJauMNn1MKTuxhc6tfWHszfzvQ@mail.gmail.com> <55FDA830.7030307@freebsd.org> <20150921105848.386d6ae0@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de> <CA%2Bb0zg-EijHbX8doBecx92e7YKdGCZUv0cqMENrzGY5WYOEAJQ@mail.gmail.com> <20150922082323.6f861448@freyja.zeit4.iv.bundesimmobilien.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 On 09/21/15 23:23, O. Hartmann wrote: > On Mon, 21 Sep 2015 21:13:18 +0000 Eric Joyner <ricera10@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> If you do a diff between r288057 and r287761, there are no >> differences between the sys/dev/e1000, sys/modules/em, and >> sys/modules/igb directories. Are you sure r287761 actually >> works? > > I'm quite sure r287761 works (and r287762 doesn't), double checked > this this morning again. I also checked r288093 and it is still not > working. > > The ensure that I'm not the culprit and stupid here: > > I use a NanoBSD environment and the only thing that gets exchanged, > is the underlying OS/OS revision. The configuration always stays > the same. The base system for all of my tests is built from a clean > source - (deleted obj/ dir, clean, fresh build into obj/ for every > test I ran). > > I realised a funny thing. Playing around with enabling/disabling > TSO (I have been told that could be the culprit in an earlier Email > from this list) with the commend sequence: > > ifconfig igb1 down ifconfig igb1 -tso ifconfig igb1 up ifconfig > igb1 down ifconfig igb1 tso ifconfig igb1 up . . . > > while a ping is pinging in the background a remote host connected > to that specific interface, the ping does work for a while and dies > then after a round trip of roughly 10 - 20. I can reproduce this. > > is that observation of any help? > > Regards, > > oh > >> >> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:58 AM O. Hartmann >> <ohartman@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >> >>> On Sat, 19 Sep 2015 11:23:44 -0700 Sean Bruno >>> <sbruno@freebsd.org> wrote: >>> > > > On 09/18/15 10:20, Eric Joyner wrote: >>>>>> He has an i210 -- he would want to revert >>>>>> e1000_i210.[ch], too. >>>>>> >>>>>> Sorry for the thrash Sean -- it sounds like it would be a >>>>>> good idea for you should revert this patch, and Jeff and >>>>>> I can go look at trying these shared code updates and igb >>>>>> changes internally again. We at Intel really could've >>>>>> done a better job of making sure these changes worked >>>>>> across a wider variety of devices. >>>>>> >>>>>> - Eric > > I've reverted the changes to head. I'll reopen the reviews and we > can proceed from there. > > sean > > >>>>>> >>>>>> On Fri, Sep 18, 2015 at 9:50 AM Sean Bruno >>>>>> <sbruno@freebsd.org <mailto:sbruno@freebsd.org>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> r287762 broke the system >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Before I revert this changeset *again* can you test >>>>>> revert r287762 from if_igb.c, e1000_82575.c and >>>>>> e1000_82575.h *only* >>>>>> >>>>>> That narrows down the change quite a bit. >>>>>> >>>>>> sean _______________________________________________ >>>>>> freebsd-current@freebsd.org >>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current@freebsd.org> mailing list >>>>>> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current >>>>>> To unsubscribe, send any mail to >>>>>> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org >>>>>> <mailto:freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org>" >>>>>> >>> >>> I'm now on r288057 on that specific machine, supposedly >>> reverted changes that seemingly has been identified as the >>> culprit. Still NO change in behaviour! >>> >>> r287761 works with the same configuration on igb (i210), any >>> further does not. Not ping/connect from the outside, no >>> ping/connect from the inside. Tried different protocols (SAMBA, >>> ssh, LDAP, DNS). Affected is/are only boxes with the igb driver >>> and i210 chipset (we do not have other chips covered by igb). >>> >>> Regards, Oliver >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-current@freebsd.org mailing list >> https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To >> unsubscribe, send any mail to >> "freebsd-current-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" > > For my entertainment (and HPS's), can you run HEAD and revert r287775? sean -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2 iQF8BAEBCgBmBQJWAbWOXxSAAAAAAC4AKGlzc3Vlci1mcHJAbm90YXRpb25zLm9w ZW5wZ3AuZmlmdGhob3JzZW1hbi5uZXRCQUFENDYzMkU3MTIxREU4RDIwOTk3REQx MjAxRUZDQTFFNzI3RTY0AAoJEBIB78oecn5kPTAH/jmm1tudLRYVtC+xb9NXHQgr dl8/fZC8/xL3m0EVM8pWdKlRbF1tHUDSB/2ftYUBEe6SIkab2IZx2Z/0VgdflrbB 05HQUuq1yM3dYBiEAjyM0oK6lfeWu2Jg8nOaA5YWi1GO2OfkuDfXRUkK3sm7xa0C PE+ZMlfofQCV0RyDu2ew17yZKYRbCXdc+GYg6CGNRRVJHeITZPyAAh8X1d7pC8G3 8vJLKC8JOmg0i5yToYSkKvXdrReHUpzF+hZKgxsl5Lb4BhcHEukkSWQVsJ9IuVGU 615sN6eVub2+OBbxJyV+CcjUVwdLJba/YBUXhWdKslDrN2z9l/sAFHCxDJlmAvc= =zdDL -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?5601B591.6000005>