Date: Tue, 27 Oct 1998 21:47:54 -0700 (MST) From: "Justin T. Gibbs" <gibbs@narnia.plutotech.com> To: Graeme Tait <graeme@echidna.com> Cc: scsi@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: CAM question 3.0-RELEASE Message-ID: <199810280447.VAA21943@narnia.plutotech.com> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.03.9810271634430.16538-100000@resnet.uoregon.edu> <3636A466.5222@echidna.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <3636A466.5222@echidna.com> you wrote: >> This is normal. The system tries to figure out how many tags each unit >> can support by experimentation and observation. Some disks are >> broken here and have to be quirk'd to turn off or reduce tags. > > Is there some reason why these messages are desirable and need to be on by > default? They help us (the SCSI developers) diagnose problems. They also give the user an idea of the capabilities of their hardware. > They certainly get annoyingly voluminous at times. The following comment > is from the freebsd-scsi archives: They will stop as soon as the minimum tag count is achieved. Do you reboot your system all the time or something? -- Justin To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-scsi" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199810280447.VAA21943>