Date: Wed, 25 Aug 2021 08:22:46 -0700 From: Gordon Tetlow <gordon@tetlows.org> To: mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD Security Advisory FreeBSD-SA-21:16.openssl Message-ID: <A032A5CA-9FF3-4DBE-A4AD-8AE20B48544D@tetlows.org> In-Reply-To: <44434c22-51c6-92cb-c9de-60fae4764347@sentex.net> References: <20210824205300.305BF72EF@freefall.freebsd.org> <44434c22-51c6-92cb-c9de-60fae4764347@sentex.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Aug 25, 2021, at 4:59 AM, mike tancsa <mike@sentex.net> wrote: > > On 8/24/2021 4:53 PM, FreeBSD Security Advisories wrote: >> >> Branch/path Hash Revision >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- >> stable/13/ 9d31ae318711 stable/13-n246940 >> releng/13.0/ 2261c814b7fa releng/13.0-n244759 >> stable/12/ r370385 >> releng/12.2/ r370396 >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > Hi All, > > Was reading the original advisory at > https://www.google.com/url?q=https://www.openssl.org/news/secadv/20210824.txt&source=gmail-imap&ust=1630497552000000&usg=AOvVaw21BGr3aGIh9CKIH3efYzY4 and it says > > "OpenSSL versions 1.0.2y and below are affected by this [CVE-2021-3712] > issue." > > Does it not then impact RELENG11 ? > > % openssl version > OpenSSL 1.0.2u-freebsd 20 Dec 2019 > > I know RELENG_11 support ends in about a month, but should it not be > flagged ? As we don't have a support contract with OpenSSL to get access to 1.0.2 patches, we could only roll the 1.1.1 patches. Best, Gordon Hat: security-officerhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?A032A5CA-9FF3-4DBE-A4AD-8AE20B48544D>