Date: Sat, 02 Aug 1997 22:38:22 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu> Cc: dmaddox@scsn.net, David Nugent <davidn@labs.usn.blaze.net.au>, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports-current/packages-current discontinued Message-ID: <552.870586702@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 02 Aug 1997 23:36:41 EDT." <Pine.BSF.3.96.970802232349.381A-100000@Journey2.mat.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[What's it going to take to get people to trim the headers, electric shocks? ;-) Trimmed yet again to include only -current] > anti-bloatist. Everyone knows that tcl and tk are like siamese twins, False. I've used TCL without a hint of Tk anywhere many times. It's more than generally useful as a scripting language, with or without a GUI. > that. I'm saying that tcl requires tk, and if we can't have tk, we > mustn't have tcl. All the other BSD environments are very friendly to tcl Sorry, but this argument is bogus. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?552.870586702>