Date: Fri, 07 Mar 2003 10:43:05 -0800 From: Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> To: Dag-Erling Smorgrav <des@ofug.org> Cc: kalts@estpak.ee, David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>, "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>, freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: "leak" in softupdates? Message-ID: <3E68E839.1080009@tenebras.com> In-Reply-To: <xzpisuvp0vu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no> References: <20030305204526.T38115@hub.org> <20030307090033.GA61037@HAL9000.homeunix.com> <20030307101718.GA1908@kevad.internal> <3E68B9B3.9030509@tenebras.com> <xzpisuvp0vu.fsf@flood.ping.uio.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Dag-Erling Smorgrav wrote: > Michael Sierchio <kudzu@tenebras.com> writes: > >>What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. If the concern is >>with stability and performance, one would track -SECURITY and >>not -STABLE. > > > What a mind-blowingly stupid thing to say. You expect stability from pre-release software (i.e. "beta")? You're surprised that the integration of new features breaks working systems? You think the yen for the latest rev is good for a production environment? Are the five best years in a Norwegian's life still spent in the first grade? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3E68E839.1080009>