Date: Tue, 09 Aug 2016 22:57:56 -0700 From: Jordan Hubbard <jordanhubbard@icloud.com> To: Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> Cc: freebsd-fs@freebsd.org Subject: Re: CEPH + FreeBSD Message-ID: <DB227381-465D-43EF-BD4D-282701199596@icloud.com> In-Reply-To: <c7001929-8935-f166-c34d-ddf75b3d0f36@digiware.nl> References: <CANw0z%2BVhYCPNWrjByXLf8yO9wA0sc05_8eVJsM-McjcGNU9KQg@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BKW7xQrN60kH37hu2Keja60a0huVjAyP6=SQNSrqus2EUMUMA@mail.gmail.com> <CANw0z%2BXrwK=6y%2BLpoiewc_eLDBYB5UZ5XpU6-YP0-K2FKwSa5w@mail.gmail.com> <A19FDEB5-1DEF-4EBF-8E9E-A1AD4688F1AA@icloud.com> <5661752C.1090200@digiware.nl> <88732E11-8570-4D02-9374-3F1419EABC6F@icloud.com> <5664BC1C.6060207@digiware.nl> <c7001929-8935-f166-c34d-ddf75b3d0f36@digiware.nl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Aug 5, 2016, at 2:47 AM, Willem Jan Withagen <wjw@digiware.nl> = wrote: >=20 > Biggest thing to get working for me ATM is ceph-disk, because that = will > get things to start installing. Making it packageble, and something = for > other to start playing with. And it is only going to work out if = people > start using it. Hi Willem, Those seem like reasonable priorities to me. I would even say that the = port is the *first* priority since it gives interested parties a quick = way to bootstrap the ceph port on FreeBSD (IIRC, the build process = itself is a little arcane) and start checking it out. I would also say = that ceps-disk is the right place to start since it=E2=80=99s a fairly = low-level place in the stack. - Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?DB227381-465D-43EF-BD4D-282701199596>