Date: Tue, 09 Apr 2013 06:09:41 -0700 From: Darren Pilgrim <list_freebsd@bluerosetech.com> To: Florent Peterschmitt <florent@peterschmitt.fr> Cc: FreeBSD Mailing List <freebsd-ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Growing list of required(ish) ports Message-ID: <51641315.3080704@bluerosetech.com> In-Reply-To: <1365441764.4112.1.camel@localhost> References: <CA%2BQLa9Af3CC=FKMkrnmSL_-frW7ZvCQJ3=q7xkHUz5-3YyE3fQ@mail.gmail.com> <51622F44.3050604@FreeBSD.org> <CA%2BQLa9C5pfcRWrLXEiKzZEvVYd5W=wbN9i5wjtp=m92Fn8oq5w@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2B7WWSfwGBfXRcmc0UJ2ebguq5%2B-pYY82eopicpPcgeKxUCj3A@mail.gmail.com> <CAN6yY1ttmkiV_ns1qfhjd8ROiZ8WfUfmaj%2Ba1N6Ezapj3-QNcw@mail.gmail.com> <CAOjFWZ6EMjsBLHde-x7ZAx1qPmCB%2BvOSyCt-WWkmxtYfJsCJQw@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2Bt49PLz4-kg-=umrPm5Aad6Wjj=Ud=n=js39EJ-dEzJ60MmrQ@mail.gmail.com> <1365441764.4112.1.camel@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 2013-04-08 10:22, Florent Peterschmitt wrote: > Yep, OpenSSH is tiny enought to keep it in base system. It would be a > big loss not to have it by default, securely installed in the base > system. I really wish it wasn't. Having OpenSSH (and thus OpenSSL) in the base means FreeBSD has an outdated version installed by default. You have to install openssl from ports in order to have modern cipher support, TLS v1.1/1.2, DTLS, etc. This puts two sets of openssl libs on the system and creates recurrent headaches with builds where the autoconfiguration selects the wrong set of libs.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?51641315.3080704>