Date: Sun, 05 Jan 1997 17:55:53 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: KATO Takenori <kato@freefall.freebsd.org> Cc: CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-sys@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/i386/isa/bs bs.c bs_isa.c bs_pisa.c bsfunc.c bsfunc.h bshw.c bshw.h bshw.lst bshw_dma.c bshw_pdma.c bsvar.h ccbque.h dvcfg.h scsi_dvcfg.h Message-ID: <11580.852515753@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 04 Jan 1997 23:10:23 PST." <199701050710.XAA17552@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> kato 97/01/04 23:10:22 > > Modified: sys/i386/isa/bs bs.c bs_isa.c bs_pisa.c bsfunc.c bsfunc.h > bshw.c bshw.h bshw.lst bshw_dma.c bshw_pdma.c > bsvar.h ccbque.h dvcfg.h scsi_dvcfg.h > Log: > Undo RCS keyword change to keep the original `$NetBSD$'. Maybe we finally want to do what we've been threatening to do for years now and take all the $Id$, $NetBSD$, $OpenBSD$, $FooBSD$ and $BarBSD$ crap out of our source tree? I recognise the *potential* benefit of such expansion, but balanced against the *clear and obvious annoyances* that they cause, I don't think they're worth it at all. Jordan
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?11580.852515753>