Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:26:28 +0200 From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net> To: David Peall <david@wcsn.wcape.school.za> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: [gentoo-announce] [ GLSA 200402-07 ] Clamav 0.65 DoSvulnerability] Message-ID: <20040219102628.GE725@straylight.m.ringlet.net> In-Reply-To: <9DCF7A9E7AD27A4F962A37F7E78607B142C360@ukhokho.ct.schoolnet.org.za> References: <9DCF7A9E7AD27A4F962A37F7E78607B142C360@ukhokho.ct.schoolnet.org.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Feb 19, 2004 at 08:38:50AM +0200, David Peall wrote: > Hi=20 >=20 > The FreeBSD port has been updated for the DoS vulnerability but the > version is still=20 > the same. >=20 > See: > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/cvsweb.cgi/ports/security/clamav/=20 Err.. strictly speaking, the port's version is not the same: it is now 0.65_7, it was 0.65_6 before. The 'port revision' number was introduced for precisely this purpose: to provide an indicator that something important has changed in the FreeBSD port even when the mainstream version of the ported software remains the same. G'luck, Peter --=20 Peter Pentchev roam@ringlet.net roam@sbnd.net roam@FreeBSD.org PGP key: http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc Key fingerprint FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553 If I were you, who would be reading this sentence? --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFANI9U7Ri2jRYZRVMRArDSAKC96VT/KV+YTJe92K9MiNZDM1tbBgCfXcET 0mO6DEvoYhzlXjwk/J+McQg= =nHYv -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --MW5yreqqjyrRcusr--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040219102628.GE725>