Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 18 Apr 1995 19:49:14 +0200
From:      Bernard.Steiner@Germany.EU.net
To:        davidg@Root.COM
Cc:        freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: couple of bugs in 2.0R 
Message-ID:  <199504181749.TAA07845@qwerty.Germany.EU.net>
In-Reply-To: Your message of Tue, 18 Apr 1995 04:39:02 PDT. <199504181139.EAA00249@corbin.Root.COM> 

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Oops.

     >It works now with the watchdog at 20; I've re-tried the original kernel w
    ith a
     >watchdog set to 2, and that failed.

This is, in fact, incorrect. The kernels don't even differ in the watchdog
timer interval. :-O I just discovered that I actually managed to get the
stupid #ifdef wrong so it was still using the 2 setting. What I ask myself
now is: Why doesn't the previous kernel work, but the new one does ?
I'll try and find differences in the configuration.

In other words: please forget my previous ranting on the if_ed watchdog.

Sorry for wasting your time on this.

Bernard



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199504181749.TAA07845>