Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 13 Apr 1997 14:48:18 +0200 (MET DST)
From:      Wolfgang Helbig <helbig@MX.BA-Stuttgart.De>
To:        paul@originat.demon.co.uk (Paul Richards)
Cc:        current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Trivial Nit-Pick Of The Week.
Message-ID:  <199704131248.OAA01359@helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de>
In-Reply-To: <8767xr9otz.fsf@originat.demon.co.uk> from Paul Richards at "Apr 13, 97 11:52:56 am"

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Geoff Mohler <gemohler@c-com.net> writes:
> 
> > > /usr/include/malloc.h:2: warning: #warning "this file includes <malloc.h> which is obsoleted, use <stdlib.h> instead"
> > > Shouldn't cpp emit a more sensible:
> > > /usr/include/malloc.h:2: #warning "this file includes <malloc.h> which is obsoleted, use <stdlib.h> instead"
> > 
> 
> Since it's "Trivial Nit-Pick Of The Week" I'll point out that there's
> no such word as "obsoleted", it should either be "obsolete" or more
> appropriately "deprecated".

Shouldn't it be "depreciated" ?
                       ^

Wolfgang, "learning English by doing"



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704131248.OAA01359>