Date: Sun, 13 Apr 1997 14:48:18 +0200 (MET DST) From: Wolfgang Helbig <helbig@MX.BA-Stuttgart.De> To: paul@originat.demon.co.uk (Paul Richards) Cc: current@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Trivial Nit-Pick Of The Week. Message-ID: <199704131248.OAA01359@helbig.informatik.ba-stuttgart.de> In-Reply-To: <8767xr9otz.fsf@originat.demon.co.uk> from Paul Richards at "Apr 13, 97 11:52:56 am"
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Geoff Mohler <gemohler@c-com.net> writes:
> 
> > > /usr/include/malloc.h:2: warning: #warning "this file includes <malloc.h> which is obsoleted, use <stdlib.h> instead"
> > > Shouldn't cpp emit a more sensible:
> > > /usr/include/malloc.h:2: #warning "this file includes <malloc.h> which is obsoleted, use <stdlib.h> instead"
> > 
> 
> Since it's "Trivial Nit-Pick Of The Week" I'll point out that there's
> no such word as "obsoleted", it should either be "obsolete" or more
> appropriately "deprecated".
Shouldn't it be "depreciated" ?
                       ^
Wolfgang, "learning English by doing"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?199704131248.OAA01359>
